Skip to content

PARENT POWER!

  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index
Menu
  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index

PARENT POWER!

  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index
Menu
  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index

PARENT POWER!

  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index
Menu
  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index

Tennessee

U.S.
Rank

#17
Overall PPI Score:
71.6%
PPI Grade Key:
← Back to Tennessee state overview
A
B
C
D
F
  • Opportunity
  • Innovation
  • Policy Environment

Charter Schools

Score:

75%

Grade:

C

Rank:

#21

One of the only states to enact significant changes in 2019, Tennessee created a new semi-independent Statewide Commission to authorize schools, a good step to be sure, but it had a rocky start in its initial attempts to authorize and become independent  of political influences. Lots more to be done as the state’s population continues to expand. 

Fast Facts:

Law passed: 2002

Most recently amended: 2019

Number of charter schools: 98

Number of charter students: 40,130

Cap on the number of schools allowed:? No

Virtual charters allowed? No

Charter Law Analysis:

AUTHORIZERS: Local school districts; the Achievement School District for charter schools within a local education agency (LEA) for students who live in a low-performing school zone; and, as of 2020, the Tennessee Public Charter School Commission (the Commission) for applications sponsored by local school boards. The Commission replaces the state board as an authorizer, though the state board has been established as the formal accountability body for charter school authorizing and compliance. Appeals for denied applications for start-up charter schools go to the state board of education until December 2020. After that, appeals will go to the Commission.

GROWTH: No cap here on the number of charter schools allowed, but there are provisions in Tennessee law that make it difficult for successful charter schools to expand; one example is a requirement that successful charters that wish to expand begin the application process anew each time. 

OPERATIONS: Charter schools do not have a blanket waiver from state rules and regulations that apply to traditional district schools. Instead, they must apply to the local district and state education commissioner for waivers from specific regulations, a practice that creates  unnecessary challenges for fledgling applicants. Tennessee prevents operators that have a for-profit corporate structure from managing charter schools which is an unusual restriction in states. 

EQUITY:  Law prescribes district authorized schools receive an amount equal to the per-pupil local and state funds and all applicable federal dollars. Commission-authorized schools receive an amount equal to the per-pupil state fund from the LEA in which the student resides. The state provides a small amount of money (around $300 per student) for charter school facilities funding. Tennessee doubled the state’s previous contribution to the Charter School Facilities Fund, bringing the total to $12 million for the coming grant year. Transportation funding may be made available but not mandated.

Learn More:

Tennessee Charter School Law

Tennessee Charter School Center

Choice Programs (Scholarships, Vouchers, Tax Credits, etc.)

Score:

68%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#12

Having ruled that a scholarship program for children from low-income families in the state’s two largest districts – Davidson and Shelby counties –  is constitutional and may go into effect, the Tennessee Supreme Court gave a green light in August 2022 to the Education Savings Account Pilot Program, which provides approximately $7,000 in funds for students to attend the independent school of their choice. While the Tennessee program is small – capped at 5,000 students – it’s likely to be expanded as the public sees the benefits of parents tailoring education to their students. The state also supports high need students with individualized education accounts.

Fast Facts:

Law enacted: 2015 and 2019

Number of programs: 2

Statewide Participation: 137

Types of programs: Education Savings Account, Voucher

Choice Laws & Analysis:

Education Savings Account
Individualized Education Account Program 
An Education Savings Account program enacted in 2015 gives parents of students with specific special needs access to an Individualized Education Account (IEA). Initially the EA program allowed only students with disabilities including autism, hearing and vision impairments, dsylexia and traumatic brain injury to use education funds in the private school determined by their parents to best serve their needs. Approximately 300 families were using approximately their education funds to obtain customized education for their students at private schools and specialized education centers, which is roughly equivalent to 100 percent of the state and local funds reflected in the state funding formula that would have gone to the student had he or she attended a zoned public school – about $7,800. This year the IEA was modified to include students with dyslexia, which opens up the program to approximately 36,000 students. There is no cap on the program, but less than 5 percent of Tennessee students are eligible to receive a scholarship.

Voucher
Education Savings Account Pilot Program
Parents in the Metro Nashville and Memphis-Shelby County school districts received encouraging news in August 2022 when a judge lifted an injunction preventing the state from launching the education account pilot program enacted in 2019. The ESA program will create accounts worth up to $7,300 per student to be used for approved educational expenses, such as tuition, transportation and tutoring, for students who enroll in a private school. Only students in the aforementioned school district in households earning less than 200% of the federal free lunch program are eligible for accounts. For the first year, enrollment is capped at 5,000 students. The opponents’ injunction caused local students to miss out on two years worth of educational opportunities, further magnified by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Learn More:

EdChoice Analysis on Tennessee

Federation for Children Choice Program Information

2019 ALEC Report Card on American Education

Teacher Quality

Score:

81%

Grade:

B

Rank:

#4

The state has overall strong teacher preparation programs at the elementary, middle and secondary level; allows teacher evaluations and performance to be a factor in compensation.

TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT: 78%
General Teacher Preparation 83%
Elementary Teacher Preparation 78%
Secondary Teacher Preparation 90%
Special Education Teacher Preparation 75%
Alternate Routes 65%  

STAFFING AND SUPPORT: 81%
Hiring 80%
Retaining Effective Teachers 81%

TEACHER EVALUATION: 85%
Teacher and Principal Evaluation

TEACHER COMPENSATION: 78%

Learn More:

National Council for Teacher Quality State Teacher Policy Database

Charter Schools

Score:

75%

Grade:

C

Rank:

#21

One of the only states to enact significant changes in 2019, Tennessee created a new semi-independent Statewide Commission to authorize schools, a good step to be sure, but it had a rocky start in its initial attempts to authorize and become independent  of political influences. Lots more to be done as the state’s population continues to expand. 

Fast Facts:

Law passed: 2002

Most recently amended: 2019

Number of charter schools: 98

Number of charter students: 40,130

Cap on the number of schools allowed:? No

Virtual charters allowed? No

Charter Law Analysis:

AUTHORIZERS: Local school districts; the Achievement School District for charter schools within a local education agency (LEA) for students who live in a low-performing school zone; and, as of 2020, the Tennessee Public Charter School Commission (the Commission) for applications sponsored by local school boards. The Commission replaces the state board as an authorizer, though the state board has been established as the formal accountability body for charter school authorizing and compliance. Appeals for denied applications for start-up charter schools go to the state board of education until December 2020. After that, appeals will go to the Commission.

GROWTH: No cap here on the number of charter schools allowed, but there are provisions in Tennessee law that make it difficult for successful charter schools to expand; one example is a requirement that successful charters that wish to expand begin the application process anew each time. 

OPERATIONS: Charter schools do not have a blanket waiver from state rules and regulations that apply to traditional district schools. Instead, they must apply to the local district and state education commissioner for waivers from specific regulations, a practice that creates  unnecessary challenges for fledgling applicants. Tennessee prevents operators that have a for-profit corporate structure from managing charter schools which is an unusual restriction in states. 

EQUITY:  Law prescribes district authorized schools receive an amount equal to the per-pupil local and state funds and all applicable federal dollars. Commission-authorized schools receive an amount equal to the per-pupil state fund from the LEA in which the student resides. The state provides a small amount of money (around $300 per student) for charter school facilities funding. Tennessee doubled the state’s previous contribution to the Charter School Facilities Fund, bringing the total to $12 million for the coming grant year. Transportation funding may be made available but not mandated.

Learn More:

Tennessee Charter School Law

Tennessee Charter School Center

Choice Programs (Scholarships, Vouchers, Tax Credits, etc.)

Score:

68%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#12

Having ruled that a scholarship program for children from low-income families in the state’s two largest districts – Davidson and Shelby counties –  is constitutional and may go into effect, the Tennessee Supreme Court gave a green light in August 2022 to the Education Savings Account Pilot Program, which provides approximately $7,000 in funds for students to attend the independent school of their choice. While the Tennessee program is small – capped at 5,000 students – it’s likely to be expanded as the public sees the benefits of parents tailoring education to their students. The state also supports high need students with individualized education accounts.

Fast Facts:

Law enacted: 2015 and 2019

Number of programs: 2

Statewide Participation: 137

Types of programs: Education Savings Account, Voucher

Choice Laws & Analysis:

Education Savings Account
Individualized Education Account Program 
An Education Savings Account program enacted in 2015 gives parents of students with specific special needs access to an Individualized Education Account (IEA). Initially the EA program allowed only students with disabilities including autism, hearing and vision impairments, dsylexia and traumatic brain injury to use education funds in the private school determined by their parents to best serve their needs. Approximately 300 families were using approximately their education funds to obtain customized education for their students at private schools and specialized education centers, which is roughly equivalent to 100 percent of the state and local funds reflected in the state funding formula that would have gone to the student had he or she attended a zoned public school – about $7,800. This year the IEA was modified to include students with dyslexia, which opens up the program to approximately 36,000 students. There is no cap on the program, but less than 5 percent of Tennessee students are eligible to receive a scholarship.

Voucher
Education Savings Account Pilot Program
Parents in the Metro Nashville and Memphis-Shelby County school districts received encouraging news in August 2022 when a judge lifted an injunction preventing the state from launching the education account pilot program enacted in 2019. The ESA program will create accounts worth up to $7,300 per student to be used for approved educational expenses, such as tuition, transportation and tutoring, for students who enroll in a private school. Only students in the aforementioned school district in households earning less than 200% of the federal free lunch program are eligible for accounts. For the first year, enrollment is capped at 5,000 students. The opponents’ injunction caused local students to miss out on two years worth of educational opportunities, further magnified by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Learn More:

EdChoice Analysis on Tennessee

Federation for Children Choice Program Information

2019 ALEC Report Card on American Education

Teacher Quality

Score:

81%

Grade:

B

Rank:

#4

The state has overall strong teacher preparation programs at the elementary, middle and secondary level; allows teacher evaluations and performance to be a factor in compensation.

TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT: 78%
General Teacher Preparation 83%
Elementary Teacher Preparation 78%
Secondary Teacher Preparation 90%
Special Education Teacher Preparation 75%
Alternate Routes 65%  

STAFFING AND SUPPORT: 81%
Hiring 80%
Retaining Effective Teachers 81%

TEACHER EVALUATION: 85%
Teacher and Principal Evaluation

TEACHER COMPENSATION: 78%

Learn More:

National Council for Teacher Quality State Teacher Policy Database

Digital & Personalized Learning

Digital Learning:

Score:

72%

Grade:

C

Rank:

#30

Until Covid, the state did not acknowledge what is now being called By the state education commissioner “a critical resource.” Only modest efforts have existed.  The Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Technology Partnership Grant was created in April 2020 by the Tennessee Department of Education, making $1 million available for school districts to support digital learning accessibility for students with disabilities. The state also has the PBS Teaching Tennessee initiative, which encourages students to use PBS shows and content to supplement summer education to prevent learning loss as well as provide some content for mathematics and ELA for parents and summer school teachers. 

On a district level, Bristol Tennessee City Schools has been encouraging digital education and personalization and has provided laptops for all 4th-12th grade students in the state to use both in class and at home. 

While short lived, it’s worth noting that in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Tennessee DOE partnered with Trevecca Nazarene University to provide teachers with digital and remote learning professional development for the summer. Over 8,000 teachers signed up within the first week.  

Bandwidth: “95.4% of students in Tennessee can access the Internet at speeds of 100 kbps per student, and many students are connected at higher speeds. But there is still work to be done. 44,962 students still need more bandwidth for digital learning.”

Personalized Learning:

Tennessee DOE has personalized learning initiatives that expand opportunity for many students across the state.

The Competency-Based Education Pilot promotes personalized learning by allowing schools to explore and learn about student-centered instructional approaches and flexibility. In 2019, there were 19 schools in 15 districts participating.

Tennessee DOE collaborated with ICF’s Appalachia Regional Comprehensive Center to create the Tennessee Micro-Credentialing Pilot for teachers to make personalized learning a part of teacher development. There are currently 45 districts participating, and 245 micro-credentials earned by teachers so far.

Learn More:

Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Technology Partnership Grant

PBS Teaching Tennessee

Bristol Tennessee City Schools

Trevecca Nazarene

Competency-Based Education Pilot

Tennessee Micro-Credentialing Pilot

COVID-19 Response

On March 16, Gov. Lee recommended all schools close temporarily in response to the COVID-19 crisis, and, on April 24, recommended they remain closed for the duration of the school year. Tennessee was not as quick to communicate guidelines and expectations for remote learning as many other states. Although it did provide training to teachers and schools on digital teaching platforms and guidance on planning, there was no requirement that districts ensure continuous learning. A set of state resources includes an online STEAM resource hub and other general information though not easily accessible.

July 28, the state released reopening guidelines that encourage in-person instruction. The governor emphasized the importance of parents having a choice whether to send their children in person or learn virtually and announced statewide resources and options for virtual learning.

Fast Facts

4th Grade Math Proficiency:

36%

8th Grade Math Proficiency:

24%

12th Grade Math Proficiency:

24% (nat'l average)

4th Grade Reading Proficiency:

30%

8th Grade Reading Proficiency:

28%

12th Grade Reading Proficiency:

37% (nat'l average)

Graduation Rate:

91%

Average SAT Score:

1200/1600

Average ACT Score:

18.6/36

Public School Enrollment:

996,709

Percent Enrolled in Charter Schools:

4.3%

Average Student Funding:

$9,896.00
Digital & Personalized Learning
Digital Learning:

Score:

72%

Grade:

C

Rank:

#30

Until Covid, the state did not acknowledge what is now being called By the state education commissioner “a critical resource.” Only modest efforts have existed.  The Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Technology Partnership Grant was created in April 2020 by the Tennessee Department of Education, making $1 million available for school districts to support digital learning accessibility for students with disabilities. The state also has the PBS Teaching Tennessee initiative, which encourages students to use PBS shows and content to supplement summer education to prevent learning loss as well as provide some content for mathematics and ELA for parents and summer school teachers. 

On a district level, Bristol Tennessee City Schools has been encouraging digital education and personalization and has provided laptops for all 4th-12th grade students in the state to use both in class and at home. 

While short lived, it’s worth noting that in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Tennessee DOE partnered with Trevecca Nazarene University to provide teachers with digital and remote learning professional development for the summer. Over 8,000 teachers signed up within the first week.  

Bandwidth: “95.4% of students in Tennessee can access the Internet at speeds of 100 kbps per student, and many students are connected at higher speeds. But there is still work to be done. 44,962 students still need more bandwidth for digital learning.”

Personalized Learning:

Tennessee DOE has personalized learning initiatives that expand opportunity for many students across the state.

The Competency-Based Education Pilot promotes personalized learning by allowing schools to explore and learn about student-centered instructional approaches and flexibility. In 2019, there were 19 schools in 15 districts participating.

Tennessee DOE collaborated with ICF’s Appalachia Regional Comprehensive Center to create the Tennessee Micro-Credentialing Pilot for teachers to make personalized learning a part of teacher development. There are currently 45 districts participating, and 245 micro-credentials earned by teachers so far.

Learn More:

Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Technology Partnership Grant

PBS Teaching Tennessee

Bristol Tennessee City Schools

Trevecca Nazarene

Competency-Based Education Pilot

Tennessee Micro-Credentialing Pilot

COVID-19 Response

On March 16, Gov. Lee recommended all schools close temporarily in response to the COVID-19 crisis, and, on April 24, recommended they remain closed for the duration of the school year. Tennessee was not as quick to communicate guidelines and expectations for remote learning as many other states. Although it did provide training to teachers and schools on digital teaching platforms and guidance on planning, there was no requirement that districts ensure continuous learning. A set of state resources includes an online STEAM resource hub and other general information though not easily accessible.

July 28, the state released reopening guidelines that encourage in-person instruction. The governor emphasized the importance of parents having a choice whether to send their children in person or learn virtually and announced statewide resources and options for virtual learning.

Fast Facts

4th Grade Math Proficiency:

36%

8th Grade Math Proficiency:

24%

12th Grade Math Proficiency:

24% (nat’l average)

4th Grade Reading Proficiency:

30%

8th Grade Reading Proficiency:

28%

12th Grade Reading Proficiency:

37% (nat’l average)

Graduation Rate:

91%

Average SAT Score:

1200/1600

Average ACT Score:

18.6/36

Public School Enrollment:

996,709

Percent Enrolled in Charter Schools:

4.3%

Average Student Funding:

$9,896.00

Leadership

Your governor:

Bill Lee (R)

First term began in 2019 (two-term limit)

Governor Bill Lee won a commanding victory and with a trifecta in Tennessee could build on his past four years of movement in the right direction.  We hope Tennesseans let their Governor know they are ready for more parent power and significant shifts in policy towards educational freedom.

State Legislature:

There is good leadership and strong support  for parent power in both the House and Senate.  A modest ESA bill, with geographic limits was adopted and 2019  also brought important improvements to the charter law, but there are still unnecessary restrictions  and the business Community while active doesn’t seem to appreciate the difference between weak laws with the right name and strong laws. This is the time to expand parent power to reach all Tennessee families.

Constitutional Issues

There is no Blaine Amendment in Tennessee and opinions have confirmed that providing for educational choice through vouchers would be constitutional. 

Learn More:

Institute for Justice: Tennessee School Choice and State Constitution

Transparency

School report cards are easily accessible from Tennessee’s DOE website by clicking Top Links. Reports are not extremely detailed, but include performance indicators on student growth and academic achievement, and a brief overview on the school environment.

Educational options and private school scholarship information are also easily accessible on the DOE website as well, under the Students and Families tab, further increasing transparency.

School board elections are not held during the general election cycle, which usually means lower voter turnout and less chance for parents voices to be heard.

Leadership
Your governor:

Bill Lee (R)

First term began in 2019 (two-term limit)

Governor Bill Lee won a commanding victory and with a trifecta in Tennessee could build on his past four years of movement in the right direction.  We hope Tennesseans let their Governor know they are ready for more parent power and significant shifts in policy towards educational freedom.

State Legislature:

There is good leadership and strong support  for parent power in both the House and Senate.  A modest ESA bill, with geographic limits was adopted and 2019  also brought important improvements to the charter law, but there are still unnecessary restrictions  and the business Community while active doesn’t seem to appreciate the difference between weak laws with the right name and strong laws. This is the time to expand parent power to reach all Tennessee families.

Constitutional Issues

There is no Blaine Amendment in Tennessee and opinions have confirmed that providing for educational choice through vouchers would be constitutional. 

Learn More:

Institute for Justice: Tennessee School Choice and State Constitution

Transparency

School report cards are easily accessible from Tennessee’s DOE website by clicking Top Links. Reports are not extremely detailed, but include performance indicators on student growth and academic achievement, and a brief overview on the school environment.

Educational options and private school scholarship information are also easily accessible on the DOE website as well, under the Students and Families tab, further increasing transparency.

School board elections are not held during the general election cycle, which usually means lower voter turnout and less chance for parents voices to be heard.

Download State Rankings

State Organizations

PPI Resources

Evaluate Your Schools

Stay Informed

Select Your State

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Charter Schools

Charter schools are public schools, open by choice, free from most rules and regulations that hamper traditional public schools and held accountable for results.

Since 1991, when charter schools were first established in Minnesota, the principle has remained the same — increased operational autonomy in exchange for increased accountability for outcomes. This freedom to innovate allows academically excellent charter schools to flourish.

As of 2020, there were more than 7,300 charter schools across the country with more than 3.3 million students, with demand higher everywhere they are located. Forty-six states, including Washington, D.C. have charter school laws. West Virginia enacted the most recent law in 2019. All charter laws are not created equal, however, and in fact, many are so flawed that they allow for only minimal opportunity for parents. PPI draws from CER’s newest Charter School Law Rankings and Scorecard, produced in the summer of 2020. For the US as a whole, the glass is more empty than full when it comes to meaningful charter choices.

Since 1996, CER has researched, analyzed, and ranked charter school laws, taking the content of each law into consideration as well as how it impacts charter schools on the ground. This Parent Power Index looks at four main areas of each state’s law:

If it allows for multiple authorizers, and if applicants have the ability to appeal a denial; whether it allows for growth, particularly with no caps on number of schools or enrollment; if schools and teachers have freedom to innovate; and if there is equitable funding of schools, including for facilities and transportation.

Charter schools are the most analyzed public school reform in decades. Since 1996, CER has studied their impact, their environment, and their practice and made recommendations for how to improve each law. The Parent Power Index charter score is based on whether the law allows for freedom and flexibility that can ensure parents, teachers and the general public are able to build vibrant, successful charter schools without undue interference from flawed state regulators, with equitable funding and parents in the driver’s seat. More about how this works can be found in CER publications, most notably Charting a New Course and The Future of School.

In addition, past rankings document how states have grown or confined charter schools and what best practices should be followed. Finally CER has provided a model charter school law for policymakers that is the standard bearer for advocates who believe that parents, not systems, should drive education.

Choice Programs

Educational choice is best defined as the availability of a multitude of public programs that provide parents with the ability to include private and religious entities – schools, tutoring, and other organizations – in their choices. Those programs are enacted at the state level, allowing in a wide variety of ways that the funds allocated for education in a state either follow the student to the institution the parent chooses or, as in the case of tax credits, public funds are redistributed to support the choices parents make, rather than automatically going to government based school districts.

These options are often referred to as scholarship programs, vouchers, tax credits, education accounts and more.

The existence of a higher degree of educational choice in a community or state, particularly for lower income students, has been found to be a significant factor in improving education and ensuring all students have access to the best school that meets their individual needs. Where once private options were only available to the more advantaged, most choice programs today ensure that those without resources have the power to shape their student’s education and invest in their future.

PPI 2020 assesses the extent to which every state gives families better and more abundant educational options through various mechanisms. Choice programs are analyzed and evaluated on their potential to reach all children across a state and for the degree to which they can actually support the full choice of parents, as opposed to only providing a modest amount of financial support. Programs where a significant population of parents can obtain scholarships or vouchers to send their children to the school of their choice score higher than those that have limitations based on geography, income, and student eligibility constraints.

To determine scores, PPI relies on well-established organizations which study, advance and support such programs. The scores were developed with this lens, and on information and ratings from EdChoice’s School Choice in America Dashboard, American Legislative Exchange Council’s Report Card on American Education: 23rd Edition, and American Federation for Children’s School Choice Interactive Map.

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality is an equally important facet of ensuring greater educational opportunity. There is a direct correlation between quality teachers and student achievement, and teachers have the power to foster highly effective learning environments and leave a lasting impact on the future of their students. State teacher policies are critical in ensuring that students have the opportunity to receive the best education possible. Without schools full of well-prepared teachers who are held accountable either directly to the parent or to taxpayers for student achievement, opportunity can be meaningless. Most states vary widely in the criteria used to train, hire, retain, evaluate, reward and advance teachers, and local rules also influence that criteria greatly, as do teachers unions. PPI looked again to the expert analysis of the National Council of Teacher Quality, and from several aspects of their work PPI extrapolated final teacher quality scores. (NCTQ does not grade each state.)

Relying solely on the rich data collected from the National Council on Teacher Quality, states are measured by across a wide range of policy categories: Training and Recruitment, Staffing and Support, Evaluation, and Compensation. The score is by no means comprehensive about teacher quality across every community and state, but it is based on the extent to which states rigorously expect, manage and measure different aspects of teacher training, hiring, evaluation and compensation. States score higher when they have strong, data-driven, performance-based accountability systems that ensure teachers are rewarded, retained, and advanced based on their effectiveness. Likewise, states that establish rigorous teacher preparation programs and offer alternative licensing programs earn higher scores.

For more information about the Teacher Quality landscape, please see the National Council on Teacher Quality’s detailed analysis in their State Teacher Policy Database.

Innovation

States are measured on their increasing commitment to and practice of innovative approaches to education that include digital learning models and pathways, full or in part, encouraging personalized learning through focus on competency and mastery – even on a pilot level – or by allowing flexibility in schools and school districts that want to do it. Personalized learning models value mastery of material over traditional subject matter time tests, and competency over end of course grades. While these practices are best decided locally, closest to the student, states can motivate, incentivize, fund, discourage or encourage.

To determine scores, the PPI drew heavily from ExcelinEd’s 2019 State Progress Toward Next Generation Learning, Aurora Institute’s 2020 Future-Focused State Policy Actions to Transform K-12 Education, and KnowledgeWorks’ 2019 State Policy Framework for Personalized Learning.

COVID-19 Response

When COVID-19 reached our shores in early 2020, states were forced to close their schools for in-person instruction. Whether and how to continue teaching and set expectations for continued learning outside of the classroom was a big debate. Many states and schools quickly pivoted to delivering education remotely, either through technology enabled tools or with low-tech paper packets and phone calls, or a combination of both. The response from schools and school districts varied widely, with some being willing to adapt and some actually discouraging both teaching and learning. CER tracked those responses (and continues to do so, given the fluidity of the situation). States that were encouraging, set expectations, and demanded that schools figure out whatever they could to keep moving students forward, tended to have more schools and districts that responded well and worked to deliver education regardless of challenges. Many states that had digital or virtual learning programs in place were able to make a more seamless shift. Innovative leaders at local and state levels rose to the occasion. But many states and localities dragged their feet and, in some cases, outright discouraged schooling to keep going, including forbidding teachers in some areas to be required to do any face to face teaching via technology.

States were evaluated based on reviewing their official notices and declarations, and by reviewing a broad array of surveys and data many groups have been maintaining. This score also factors in states’ prior commitments to expanding broadband and internet access and how they worked to provide devices to keep students learning and engaged.

What was, and is, a challenging and unprecedented time for schools, teachers, and parents was also an opportunity to look at states’ and schools’ abilities to adapt, be flexible, and innovate.

For more on Education Innovation, check out the CER ACTION Series:

  • Virtual Events & Videos
  • Key Data
  • Resources
  • Publications

Leadership

Improving education opportunity and innovation requires leaders who boldly and courageously push forward to create or expand successful programs that allow a wide variety of educational choice and individualized programs to thrive. Governors and state legislators are the most important entities in each state to pave the way, or deter, expanded parent power. Some leaders pay lip service to issues, while others wake up with a fire in their belly to ensure that they are doing what they can every day to push through conventional wisdom and demand 21st century schooling opportunities for all students.

Whether or not your governor is the bold, fire-in-the-belly kind, or a passive applauder of others’ efforts, is evaluated to help you push or prod or applaud. PPI looks at their positions AND actions on charter schools, choice programs, innovation, and commitment to increasing educational opportunities for all students at every level and summarizes it for you here. You have the power to elect leaders who prioritize parents and students!

Constitutional Issues

The ability for states to enact educational change can be significantly limited depending on certain provisions in state constitutions.

The most common clause that limits educational opportunity in most states are “Blaine Amendments” – named after 19th century Congressman James Blaine nearly 150 years ago. Historically, these provisions in 37 state constitutions were either interpreted to restrict educational choice programs that include private schools or have been a deterrent for many programs being considered, let alone enacted.

This issue received a great deal of press leading up to and following the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 30, 2020 decision in the case of Espinoza vs Montana Department of Revenue, a case that dealt with Montana’s Blaine Amendment. That landmark decision found that the U.S. Constitution “forbids states from excluding religious schools as options for families participating in educational choice programs, including through Blaine Amendments.”

As a result, most states have a new path to enact programs that provide options for families, including religious schools. Their individual versions of Blaine Amendments can either be nullified with attorney generals’ opinions, with legislation or with both. Additional restrictions on expanded opportunity are often dedicated by what is called a Compelled Support Clause where dated constitutional language restricts public funding to government entities.

We look at each state’s particular constitutional issues, utilizing a number of sources, CER attorney analysis and the Institute for Justice’s research as our guide. Additional information about Espinoza and Blaine Amendments can be found here.

In addition, if states have other constitutional barriers to more opportunity, they are evaluated in this area.

Transparency

Transparency is a key element of providing great opportunities for students. Every parent needs and deserves full transparency of school-level data to allow them to make informed decisions and drive changes in how their students are educated. School report cards empower parents in their decision making by giving them access to meaningful and quality education data about a particular school or district. Report cards often provide information on student performance, student growth, attendance, graduation rates, demographics, teacher quality, school environment, assessments, and more. States that have greater transparency and accountability provide the public with data that is current, readily available, and easy to understand.

States are measured based on the transparency and accessibility of data for the average person looking to learn about their child’s school. States have more gas in the tank when school report cards are easily accessible from their state DOE homepage; report cards are comprehensive, user-friendly, and easy to understand; and information about educational options are readily available. Additionally, states score higher when they hold School Board Elections during the General Election cycle, as opposed to off-times of the year when turnout is low, because this tends to afford parents more power in their decision-making.