Skip to content

PARENT POWER!

  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index
Menu
  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index

PARENT POWER!

  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index
Menu
  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index

PARENT POWER!

  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index
Menu
  • National Overview
  • Select Your State
  • About The Index

Missouri

U.S.
Rank

#19
Overall PPI Score:
71%
PPI Grade Key:
← Back to Missouri state overview
A
B
C
D
F
  • Opportunity
  • Innovation
  • Policy Environment

Charter Schools

Score:

78%

Grade:

C

Rank:

#16

Despite the existence of multiple authorizers and reasonable autonomy for schools, the Show-Me state has a lot of work to do. First, the law still restricts charters either to Kansas City and St. Louis, or to districts which have lost accreditation, meaning students whose schools don’t work for them regardless of where they live cannot avail themselves of the lifesaving opportunities charters offer in thousands of communities nationwide. It remains the only state that has such stringent geographic restrictions, despite a huge need. The state also limits charters to a highly inequitable funding stream.

Fast Facts:

Law passed: 1998

Most recently amended: 2019

Number of charter schools: 37

Number of charter students: 25,634

Cap on the number of schools allowed:? No, but there are geographic restrictions on the types of districts that can have charters.

Virtual charters allowed? Yes. New rules adopted in 2022 require that virtual school programs provide regular progress reports for each student at least four times per school year to the school district or charter school, a much more onerous accountability requirement than non-virtual schools are required to report.

Charter Law Analysis:

AUTHORIZERS: Multiple authorizers, including local school boards, the Missouri Charter Public School Commission, community colleges, vocational and technical schools, and universities. Active university authorizers include the University of Central Missouri-Warrensburg, University of Missouri-Columbia, Saint Louis University, Southeast Missouri State University, University of Missouri-St. Louis, Washington University. Together they authorize 26 schools. The Missouri Charter Public School Commission which was added as an uber-authorizer several years ago adding an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. It can sponsor charter schools in Kansas City Public Schools district, St. Louis Public Schools district, any unaccredited district and any district provisionally accredited for 3 or more years and all approved charter applications must be submitted to the state board of education, which then approves or denies.

Denied applications to local or university authorizers or the commission can appeal to the state board.

GROWTH: Minimal growth from two years ago, the state’s charter sector is largely limited to Kansas City and St. Louis as a result of the original law restricting charters to these areas. Because charter schools are prohibited from serving more than 35% of public school students in accredited school districts with 1,500 or more students, potential for more spaces is limited.

OPERATIONS:Charter schools enjoy a blanket waiver from most non-safety and standards rules and regulations governing traditional public schools and 20% of charter school teachers are exempt from certification in Missouri if they are working towards certification and have expertise in the content area.  A 2022 law regulates the composition of governing board members to residents of the state and says that any charter management companies must be  incorporated as nonprofit corporations and their various schools’ test scores be posted on their websites, all nuisance actions entirely unrelated to good education and opportunity.

EQUITY: SSchool districts are required to direct to charter schools their per-pupil operations funding for each student as well as commensurate state and federal funding. However, because of a change in the method by which Missouri calculates aid for schools, an estimated $62 to nearly $75 million in state funds is anticipated to be sent to charter schools in fiscal year 2023, according to a fiscal analysis of the bill.  The state department of education retains 1.5 percent of state and local funding and passes that on to authorizers for administrative fees. There is no per-pupil facilities funding.

Learn More:

Missouri Charter School Law

Missouri Charter Public School Association

Choice Programs (Scholarships, Vouchers, Tax Credits, etc.)

Score:

65%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#17

In July 2021 the state passed their first school choice program, an Education Savings Account Program. Although this is a positive advancement, the program has barriers to eligibility that need to be knocked down to give all students opportunity.

Fast Facts:

Law enacted: 2021

Number of programs: 1

Statewide Participation: 0

Types of programs: Education Savings Account

Choice Laws & Analysis:

Education Savings Account
Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program
In 2021 Missouri enacted its first school choice program in the state, and the second tax-credit ESA in the nation (it is funded by tax credits instead of through state funding formulas.) Qualified students are Missouri residents residing in a county with a charter form of government; or a city with a population of at least 30,000, who either have an IEP or live in a household whose total income does not exceed 200 percent of the income that qualifies a student for free and reduced-price lunches, and who attended a public school for at least one semester during the past 12 months or is entering kindergarten or first grade. Total tax credits in any given year cannot exceed $50 million; this amount may be adjusted for inflation with a maximum cap of $75 million. The average scholarship value per pupil will be up to $6,375, around half of the average per-pupil funding amount for traditional public schools. The program is projected to only serve 0.6% of the state’s K-12 population.

Learn More:

2019 ALEC Report Card on American Education

Teacher Quality

Score:

68%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#38

Considers student growth data as a “significant” factor in evaluation, and requires elementary teacher candidates to pass multi-content tests (2020).

TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT: 69%
General Teacher Preparation 77%
Elementary Teacher Preparation 58%
Secondary Teacher Preparation 85%
Special Education Teacher Preparation 58%
Alternate Routes 65%  

STAFFING AND SUPPORT: 67%
Hiring 65%
Retaining Effective Teachers 69%

TEACHER EVALUATION: 73%

TEACHER COMPENSATION: 62%

Learn More:

National Council for Teacher Quality State Teacher Policy Database

Charter Schools

Score:

78%

Grade:

C

Rank:

#16

Despite the existence of multiple authorizers and reasonable autonomy for schools, the Show-Me state has a lot of work to do. First, the law still restricts charters either to Kansas City and St. Louis, or to districts which have lost accreditation, meaning students whose schools don’t work for them regardless of where they live cannot avail themselves of the lifesaving opportunities charters offer in thousands of communities nationwide. It remains the only state that has such stringent geographic restrictions, despite a huge need. The state also limits charters to a highly inequitable funding stream.

Fast Facts:

Law passed: 1998

Most recently amended: 2019

Number of charter schools: 37

Number of charter students: 25,634

Cap on the number of schools allowed:? No, but there are geographic restrictions on the types of districts that can have charters.

Virtual charters allowed? Yes. New rules adopted in 2022 require that virtual school programs provide regular progress reports for each student at least four times per school year to the school district or charter school, a much more onerous accountability requirement than non-virtual schools are required to report.

Charter Law Analysis:

AUTHORIZERS: Multiple authorizers, including local school boards, the Missouri Charter Public School Commission, community colleges, vocational and technical schools, and universities. Active university authorizers include the University of Central Missouri-Warrensburg, University of Missouri-Columbia, Saint Louis University, Southeast Missouri State University, University of Missouri-St. Louis, Washington University. Together they authorize 26 schools. The Missouri Charter Public School Commission which was added as an uber-authorizer several years ago adding an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. It can sponsor charter schools in Kansas City Public Schools district, St. Louis Public Schools district, any unaccredited district and any district provisionally accredited for 3 or more years and all approved charter applications must be submitted to the state board of education, which then approves or denies.

Denied applications to local or university authorizers or the commission can appeal to the state board.

GROWTH: Minimal growth from two years ago, the state’s charter sector is largely limited to Kansas City and St. Louis as a result of the original law restricting charters to these areas. Because charter schools are prohibited from serving more than 35% of public school students in accredited school districts with 1,500 or more students, potential for more spaces is limited.

OPERATIONS:Charter schools enjoy a blanket waiver from most non-safety and standards rules and regulations governing traditional public schools and 20% of charter school teachers are exempt from certification in Missouri if they are working towards certification and have expertise in the content area.  A 2022 law regulates the composition of governing board members to residents of the state and says that any charter management companies must be  incorporated as nonprofit corporations and their various schools’ test scores be posted on their websites, all nuisance actions entirely unrelated to good education and opportunity.

EQUITY: SSchool districts are required to direct to charter schools their per-pupil operations funding for each student as well as commensurate state and federal funding. However, because of a change in the method by which Missouri calculates aid for schools, an estimated $62 to nearly $75 million in state funds is anticipated to be sent to charter schools in fiscal year 2023, according to a fiscal analysis of the bill.  The state department of education retains 1.5 percent of state and local funding and passes that on to authorizers for administrative fees. There is no per-pupil facilities funding.

Learn More:

Missouri Charter School Law

Missouri Charter Public School Association

Choice Programs (Scholarships, Vouchers, Tax Credits, etc.)

Score:

65%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#17

In July 2021 the state passed their first school choice program, an Education Savings Account Program. Although this is a positive advancement, the program has barriers to eligibility that need to be knocked down to give all students opportunity.

Fast Facts:

Law enacted: 2021

Number of programs: 1

Statewide Participation: 0

Types of programs: Education Savings Account

Choice Laws & Analysis:

Education Savings Account
Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program
In 2021 Missouri enacted its first school choice program in the state, and the second tax-credit ESA in the nation (it is funded by tax credits instead of through state funding formulas.) Qualified students are Missouri residents residing in a county with a charter form of government; or a city with a population of at least 30,000, who either have an IEP or live in a household whose total income does not exceed 200 percent of the income that qualifies a student for free and reduced-price lunches, and who attended a public school for at least one semester during the past 12 months or is entering kindergarten or first grade. Total tax credits in any given year cannot exceed $50 million; this amount may be adjusted for inflation with a maximum cap of $75 million. The average scholarship value per pupil will be up to $6,375, around half of the average per-pupil funding amount for traditional public schools. The program is projected to only serve 0.6% of the state’s K-12 population.

Learn More:

2019 ALEC Report Card on American Education

Teacher Quality

Score:

68%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#38

Considers student growth data as a “significant” factor in evaluation, and requires elementary teacher candidates to pass multi-content tests (2020).

TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT: 69%
General Teacher Preparation 77%
Elementary Teacher Preparation 58%
Secondary Teacher Preparation 85%
Special Education Teacher Preparation 58%
Alternate Routes 65%  

STAFFING AND SUPPORT: 67%
Hiring 65%
Retaining Effective Teachers 69%

TEACHER EVALUATION: 73%

TEACHER COMPENSATION: 62%

Learn More:

National Council for Teacher Quality State Teacher Policy Database

Digital & Personalized Learning

Digital Learning:

Score:

68%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#37

The Missouri Connect & Learn Initiative was launched by the Office of the Governor, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and the non-profit Education SuperHighway to ensure that school districts have internet access. This program gives school districts technical assistance and upgrades to make sure that all schools have infrastructure, bandwidth, and wifi connectivity. 

The eLearning for Educators program is a grant that provides professional development for more than 2,100 K-12 teachers in the state, mostly in at-risk areas. Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, KETC/Channel 9 St. Louis Public Television, Missouri State University, and University of Missouri are partners. 

Missouri Course Access and Virtual School Program is a state virtual school that was established in 2007 by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. MOCAP gives district, charter, private and homeschool students access to online courses to accelerate their education. MOCAP currently serves more than 1,800 students in grades 9-12, however they are currently working on expanding the program to K-12. MOCAP is not an online high school that grants diplomas, they offer supplemental courses that students can then apply to their transcript. 

Missouri’s school districts –  Liberty 53 Public Schools, and Springfield Public Schools  -are members of the Digital Promise League of Innovative Schools, providing over 37,000 students access to digital learning. The League of Innovative Schools is a network of school leaders in 114 districts in 34 states that aim to enhance and scale digital learning opportunities for students across the nation.

Bandwidth: 97.3% of students in Missouri can access the Internet at speeds of 100 kbps per student, and many students are connected at higher speeds.

Personalized Learning:

Missouri does not have any policies to foster personalized learning, although some charter schools in the state are using personalized learning.

Learn More:

Connect & Learn Initiative

eLearning for Educators

Missouri Course Access and Virtual School Program

League of Innovative Schools

COVID-19 Response

Governor Parson provided updates regularly regarding Missouri school closures; schools were first closed on March 19th, and such closures were extended through the end of the school year on April 9th. Missouri paid particular attention to access to devices and the internet. They did not require plans from districts, but did strongly encourage supporting student learning in the way that best suited the students.

Education Commissioner Margie Vandeven emphasized the need to empower district innovation and creativity: “School services should continue through the last day of school in each school district, as pre-established by the school calendar approved by the local school board. We know remote teaching and learning looks different in every district, so we are simply asking our school leaders to continue to be creative.”

Some districts initially sent school buses to neighborhoods to provide wifi hotspots for students and provided schoolwork online, on USB drives, and as paper copies – whatever worked best for each student. The state worked to solve the connectivity problems and also provided guidance on remote learning plans and other resources for students, parents, teachers, and schools on the state department of education site.

The state required districts to open by August 24 with part- or full-time in-person instruction with students required to be in school a minimum of two days per week. Districts can apply for a waiver to delay in-person instruction.

Fast Facts

4th Grade Math Proficiency:

34%

8th Grade Math Proficiency:

24%

12th Grade Math Proficiency:

24% (nat'l average)

4th Grade Reading Proficiency:

30%

8th Grade Reading Proficiency:

29%

12th Grade Reading Proficiency:

37% (nat'l average)

Graduation Rate:

90%

Average SAT Score:

1200/1600

Average ACT Score:

20.2/36

Public School Enrollment:

889,135

Percent Enrolled in Charter Schools:

2.7%

Average Student Funding:

$11,239.00
Digital & Personalized Learning
Digital Learning:

Score:

68%

Grade:

D

Rank:

#37

The Missouri Connect & Learn Initiative was launched by the Office of the Governor, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and the non-profit Education SuperHighway to ensure that school districts have internet access. This program gives school districts technical assistance and upgrades to make sure that all schools have infrastructure, bandwidth, and wifi connectivity. 

The eLearning for Educators program is a grant that provides professional development for more than 2,100 K-12 teachers in the state, mostly in at-risk areas. Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, KETC/Channel 9 St. Louis Public Television, Missouri State University, and University of Missouri are partners. 

Missouri Course Access and Virtual School Program is a state virtual school that was established in 2007 by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. MOCAP gives district, charter, private and homeschool students access to online courses to accelerate their education. MOCAP currently serves more than 1,800 students in grades 9-12, however they are currently working on expanding the program to K-12. MOCAP is not an online high school that grants diplomas, they offer supplemental courses that students can then apply to their transcript. 

Missouri’s school districts –  Liberty 53 Public Schools, and Springfield Public Schools  -are members of the Digital Promise League of Innovative Schools, providing over 37,000 students access to digital learning. The League of Innovative Schools is a network of school leaders in 114 districts in 34 states that aim to enhance and scale digital learning opportunities for students across the nation.

Bandwidth: 97.3% of students in Missouri can access the Internet at speeds of 100 kbps per student, and many students are connected at higher speeds.

Personalized Learning:

Missouri does not have any policies to foster personalized learning, although some charter schools in the state are using personalized learning.

Learn More:

Connect & Learn Initiative

eLearning for Educators

Missouri Course Access and Virtual School Program

League of Innovative Schools

COVID-19 Response

Governor Parson provided updates regularly regarding Missouri school closures; schools were first closed on March 19th, and such closures were extended through the end of the school year on April 9th. Missouri paid particular attention to access to devices and the internet. They did not require plans from districts, but did strongly encourage supporting student learning in the way that best suited the students.

Education Commissioner Margie Vandeven emphasized the need to empower district innovation and creativity: “School services should continue through the last day of school in each school district, as pre-established by the school calendar approved by the local school board. We know remote teaching and learning looks different in every district, so we are simply asking our school leaders to continue to be creative.”

Some districts initially sent school buses to neighborhoods to provide wifi hotspots for students and provided schoolwork online, on USB drives, and as paper copies – whatever worked best for each student. The state worked to solve the connectivity problems and also provided guidance on remote learning plans and other resources for students, parents, teachers, and schools on the state department of education site.

The state required districts to open by August 24 with part- or full-time in-person instruction with students required to be in school a minimum of two days per week. Districts can apply for a waiver to delay in-person instruction.

Fast Facts

4th Grade Math Proficiency:

34%

8th Grade Math Proficiency:

24%

12th Grade Math Proficiency:

24% (nat’l average)

4th Grade Reading Proficiency:

30%

8th Grade Reading Proficiency:

29%

12th Grade Reading Proficiency:

37% (nat’l average)

Graduation Rate:

90%

Average SAT Score:

1200/1600

Average ACT Score:

20.2/36

Public School Enrollment:

889,135

Percent Enrolled in Charter Schools:

2.7%

Average Student Funding:

$11,239.00

Leadership

Your governor:

Michael Parson (R)

First term began in 2018 (two-term limit)

Governor Mike Parson was elected in 2018 but has been quiet on the subject of parent power and educational choice. We have also not seen or heard a lot of push for growth in innovation, and changes in how students learn and their environments might benefit from both.

State Legislature:

The House and Senate here are both Republican controlled  yet despite little allegiance to the union, expanding educational opportunities in Missouri has been an impossible task. In 2019, an ESA bill and a tax credit bill both seemed to be gaining momentum, but both ultimately stalled in the Senate.  Another state where Innovation is also not prominent in discussions other than recognizing the need for digital learning post Covid.

Constitutional Issues

Missouri has a Compelled Support Clause and Blaine Amendments, and the Missouri Supreme Court has issued restrictive interpretations, not prohibiting educational choice programs, but shedding doubt on their constitutionality under current interpretations.

Learn More:

Institute for Justice: Missouri School Choice and State Constitution

Transparency

School report cards can be found under the School Data subheading on Missouri’s DOE website. While the report card contains a lot of data, the report cards are not very user-friendly and easy to navigate. Report cards are comprehensive and up-to-date, but are somewhat cumbersome, requiring users to flip through 22 different tabs and scroll through small tables to locate the information they are looking for.

Information on charter schools can be easily found on the main page, which is important for being transparent with all options available to students.

School board elections are not held during the general election cycle, which usually means lower voter turnout.

Leadership
Your governor:

Michael Parson (R)

First term began in 2018 (two-term limit)

Governor Mike Parson was elected in 2018 but has been quiet on the subject of parent power and educational choice. We have also not seen or heard a lot of push for growth in innovation, and changes in how students learn and their environments might benefit from both.

State Legislature:

The House and Senate here are both Republican controlled  yet despite little allegiance to the union, expanding educational opportunities in Missouri has been an impossible task. In 2019, an ESA bill and a tax credit bill both seemed to be gaining momentum, but both ultimately stalled in the Senate.  Another state where Innovation is also not prominent in discussions other than recognizing the need for digital learning post Covid.

Constitutional Issues

Missouri has a Compelled Support Clause and Blaine Amendments, and the Missouri Supreme Court has issued restrictive interpretations, not prohibiting educational choice programs, but shedding doubt on their constitutionality under current interpretations.

Learn More:

Institute for Justice: Missouri School Choice and State Constitution

Transparency

School report cards can be found under the School Data subheading on Missouri’s DOE website. While the report card contains a lot of data, the report cards are not very user-friendly and easy to navigate. Report cards are comprehensive and up-to-date, but are somewhat cumbersome, requiring users to flip through 22 different tabs and scroll through small tables to locate the information they are looking for.

Information on charter schools can be easily found on the main page, which is important for being transparent with all options available to students.

School board elections are not held during the general election cycle, which usually means lower voter turnout.

Download State Rankings

State Organizations

PPI Resources

Evaluate Your Schools

Stay Informed

Select Your State

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Charter Schools

Charter schools are public schools, open by choice, free from most rules and regulations that hamper traditional public schools and held accountable for results.

Since 1991, when charter schools were first established in Minnesota, the principle has remained the same — increased operational autonomy in exchange for increased accountability for outcomes. This freedom to innovate allows academically excellent charter schools to flourish.

As of 2020, there were more than 7,300 charter schools across the country with more than 3.3 million students, with demand higher everywhere they are located. Forty-six states, including Washington, D.C. have charter school laws. West Virginia enacted the most recent law in 2019. All charter laws are not created equal, however, and in fact, many are so flawed that they allow for only minimal opportunity for parents. PPI draws from CER’s newest Charter School Law Rankings and Scorecard, produced in the summer of 2020. For the US as a whole, the glass is more empty than full when it comes to meaningful charter choices.

Since 1996, CER has researched, analyzed, and ranked charter school laws, taking the content of each law into consideration as well as how it impacts charter schools on the ground. This Parent Power Index looks at four main areas of each state’s law:

If it allows for multiple authorizers, and if applicants have the ability to appeal a denial; whether it allows for growth, particularly with no caps on number of schools or enrollment; if schools and teachers have freedom to innovate; and if there is equitable funding of schools, including for facilities and transportation.

Charter schools are the most analyzed public school reform in decades. Since 1996, CER has studied their impact, their environment, and their practice and made recommendations for how to improve each law. The Parent Power Index charter score is based on whether the law allows for freedom and flexibility that can ensure parents, teachers and the general public are able to build vibrant, successful charter schools without undue interference from flawed state regulators, with equitable funding and parents in the driver’s seat. More about how this works can be found in CER publications, most notably Charting a New Course and The Future of School.

In addition, past rankings document how states have grown or confined charter schools and what best practices should be followed. Finally CER has provided a model charter school law for policymakers that is the standard bearer for advocates who believe that parents, not systems, should drive education.

Choice Programs

Educational choice is best defined as the availability of a multitude of public programs that provide parents with the ability to include private and religious entities – schools, tutoring, and other organizations – in their choices. Those programs are enacted at the state level, allowing in a wide variety of ways that the funds allocated for education in a state either follow the student to the institution the parent chooses or, as in the case of tax credits, public funds are redistributed to support the choices parents make, rather than automatically going to government based school districts.

These options are often referred to as scholarship programs, vouchers, tax credits, education accounts and more.

The existence of a higher degree of educational choice in a community or state, particularly for lower income students, has been found to be a significant factor in improving education and ensuring all students have access to the best school that meets their individual needs. Where once private options were only available to the more advantaged, most choice programs today ensure that those without resources have the power to shape their student’s education and invest in their future.

PPI 2020 assesses the extent to which every state gives families better and more abundant educational options through various mechanisms. Choice programs are analyzed and evaluated on their potential to reach all children across a state and for the degree to which they can actually support the full choice of parents, as opposed to only providing a modest amount of financial support. Programs where a significant population of parents can obtain scholarships or vouchers to send their children to the school of their choice score higher than those that have limitations based on geography, income, and student eligibility constraints.

To determine scores, PPI relies on well-established organizations which study, advance and support such programs. The scores were developed with this lens, and on information and ratings from EdChoice’s School Choice in America Dashboard, American Legislative Exchange Council’s Report Card on American Education: 23rd Edition, and American Federation for Children’s School Choice Interactive Map.

Teacher Quality

Teacher Quality is an equally important facet of ensuring greater educational opportunity. There is a direct correlation between quality teachers and student achievement, and teachers have the power to foster highly effective learning environments and leave a lasting impact on the future of their students. State teacher policies are critical in ensuring that students have the opportunity to receive the best education possible. Without schools full of well-prepared teachers who are held accountable either directly to the parent or to taxpayers for student achievement, opportunity can be meaningless. Most states vary widely in the criteria used to train, hire, retain, evaluate, reward and advance teachers, and local rules also influence that criteria greatly, as do teachers unions. PPI looked again to the expert analysis of the National Council of Teacher Quality, and from several aspects of their work PPI extrapolated final teacher quality scores. (NCTQ does not grade each state.)

Relying solely on the rich data collected from the National Council on Teacher Quality, states are measured by across a wide range of policy categories: Training and Recruitment, Staffing and Support, Evaluation, and Compensation. The score is by no means comprehensive about teacher quality across every community and state, but it is based on the extent to which states rigorously expect, manage and measure different aspects of teacher training, hiring, evaluation and compensation. States score higher when they have strong, data-driven, performance-based accountability systems that ensure teachers are rewarded, retained, and advanced based on their effectiveness. Likewise, states that establish rigorous teacher preparation programs and offer alternative licensing programs earn higher scores.

For more information about the Teacher Quality landscape, please see the National Council on Teacher Quality’s detailed analysis in their State Teacher Policy Database.

Innovation

States are measured on their increasing commitment to and practice of innovative approaches to education that include digital learning models and pathways, full or in part, encouraging personalized learning through focus on competency and mastery – even on a pilot level – or by allowing flexibility in schools and school districts that want to do it. Personalized learning models value mastery of material over traditional subject matter time tests, and competency over end of course grades. While these practices are best decided locally, closest to the student, states can motivate, incentivize, fund, discourage or encourage.

To determine scores, the PPI drew heavily from ExcelinEd’s 2019 State Progress Toward Next Generation Learning, Aurora Institute’s 2020 Future-Focused State Policy Actions to Transform K-12 Education, and KnowledgeWorks’ 2019 State Policy Framework for Personalized Learning.

COVID-19 Response

When COVID-19 reached our shores in early 2020, states were forced to close their schools for in-person instruction. Whether and how to continue teaching and set expectations for continued learning outside of the classroom was a big debate. Many states and schools quickly pivoted to delivering education remotely, either through technology enabled tools or with low-tech paper packets and phone calls, or a combination of both. The response from schools and school districts varied widely, with some being willing to adapt and some actually discouraging both teaching and learning. CER tracked those responses (and continues to do so, given the fluidity of the situation). States that were encouraging, set expectations, and demanded that schools figure out whatever they could to keep moving students forward, tended to have more schools and districts that responded well and worked to deliver education regardless of challenges. Many states that had digital or virtual learning programs in place were able to make a more seamless shift. Innovative leaders at local and state levels rose to the occasion. But many states and localities dragged their feet and, in some cases, outright discouraged schooling to keep going, including forbidding teachers in some areas to be required to do any face to face teaching via technology.

States were evaluated based on reviewing their official notices and declarations, and by reviewing a broad array of surveys and data many groups have been maintaining. This score also factors in states’ prior commitments to expanding broadband and internet access and how they worked to provide devices to keep students learning and engaged.

What was, and is, a challenging and unprecedented time for schools, teachers, and parents was also an opportunity to look at states’ and schools’ abilities to adapt, be flexible, and innovate.

For more on Education Innovation, check out the CER ACTION Series:

  • Virtual Events & Videos
  • Key Data
  • Resources
  • Publications

Leadership

Improving education opportunity and innovation requires leaders who boldly and courageously push forward to create or expand successful programs that allow a wide variety of educational choice and individualized programs to thrive. Governors and state legislators are the most important entities in each state to pave the way, or deter, expanded parent power. Some leaders pay lip service to issues, while others wake up with a fire in their belly to ensure that they are doing what they can every day to push through conventional wisdom and demand 21st century schooling opportunities for all students.

Whether or not your governor is the bold, fire-in-the-belly kind, or a passive applauder of others’ efforts, is evaluated to help you push or prod or applaud. PPI looks at their positions AND actions on charter schools, choice programs, innovation, and commitment to increasing educational opportunities for all students at every level and summarizes it for you here. You have the power to elect leaders who prioritize parents and students!

Constitutional Issues

The ability for states to enact educational change can be significantly limited depending on certain provisions in state constitutions.

The most common clause that limits educational opportunity in most states are “Blaine Amendments” – named after 19th century Congressman James Blaine nearly 150 years ago. Historically, these provisions in 37 state constitutions were either interpreted to restrict educational choice programs that include private schools or have been a deterrent for many programs being considered, let alone enacted.

This issue received a great deal of press leading up to and following the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 30, 2020 decision in the case of Espinoza vs Montana Department of Revenue, a case that dealt with Montana’s Blaine Amendment. That landmark decision found that the U.S. Constitution “forbids states from excluding religious schools as options for families participating in educational choice programs, including through Blaine Amendments.”

As a result, most states have a new path to enact programs that provide options for families, including religious schools. Their individual versions of Blaine Amendments can either be nullified with attorney generals’ opinions, with legislation or with both. Additional restrictions on expanded opportunity are often dedicated by what is called a Compelled Support Clause where dated constitutional language restricts public funding to government entities.

We look at each state’s particular constitutional issues, utilizing a number of sources, CER attorney analysis and the Institute for Justice’s research as our guide. Additional information about Espinoza and Blaine Amendments can be found here.

In addition, if states have other constitutional barriers to more opportunity, they are evaluated in this area.

Transparency

Transparency is a key element of providing great opportunities for students. Every parent needs and deserves full transparency of school-level data to allow them to make informed decisions and drive changes in how their students are educated. School report cards empower parents in their decision making by giving them access to meaningful and quality education data about a particular school or district. Report cards often provide information on student performance, student growth, attendance, graduation rates, demographics, teacher quality, school environment, assessments, and more. States that have greater transparency and accountability provide the public with data that is current, readily available, and easy to understand.

States are measured based on the transparency and accessibility of data for the average person looking to learn about their child’s school. States have more gas in the tank when school report cards are easily accessible from their state DOE homepage; report cards are comprehensive, user-friendly, and easy to understand; and information about educational options are readily available. Additionally, states score higher when they hold School Board Elections during the General Election cycle, as opposed to off-times of the year when turnout is low, because this tends to afford parents more power in their decision-making.